Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote in The Social Contract (Rousseau), a philosopher of the impression of a civil society. Rousseau shows a great capacity to allow reason to prevail in their claims handling policies. In the writings of the “slavery” of the article, Rousseau describes the nature of the conflict, claiming that the war between the states and not man. Rousseau is due to human action and claims that there exist a prerequisite to civil society. Following his logic, he speculates that the enslavement of individuals and / or whole societies can not exist in the civilian world because the contract would be invalid in the eyes of reason and nature. I think that should Rousseau’s ideas and sound, and some should be incorporated into modern legal concepts. Natural law works subtly against violators of it by natural methods. This can sometimes form in the consciousness of men and assigns them to act in the regulation of the natural order.
Rousseau in his letter, tried to show that there is a greater motivation than the conscience of man, in his statement about men who have a voluntary contract of slavery “is verbalized with the other alienate freedom contrary to the natural order … “(Rousseau 61).
Rousseau continues, that slavery is not a valid contract with the equity argument for both sides does not exist, the effect that such an arrangement in the eyes of common sense “futile and meaningless” (Rousseau, 61). » Read more: Rousseau – Slavery, War, and Natural Law