Archive for October, 2010

The Rule of Law

October 17th, 2010

One of the most basic needs of civil society is the rule of law means that people have the right of the country to follow regardless of status or position in society. In the modern world, developed countries feel proud that their society is governed by the rule of law, while most developing countries like India are ashamed that their companies do not have the rule of law. The developed countries are the model for the underdeveloped countries where the rule of law is still a distant dream.

Companies that follow the rule of law often as civilized as it is much more order in society. Everything in these companies seems to be OK. The streets are clean, lawns and parks are well maintained, are civil servants working in offices, trains and transport links in time. In addition, there is virtually no corruption in public service. People are well paid, better efficiency and keep everything clean and tidy. They seem to people in other parts of the world, which often ask why they do not like it to be perfect.

All societies need laws for their existence. Laws may vary in each society, but there are some principles that are common to all laws in the world. These principles are equality, fraternity, justice and freedom. The Indian constitution, for example, to the objectives in the Preamble to the Constitution to all citizens justice, liberty, equality and promotion are to be found among them the spirit of brotherhood have to be integrated.

These principles are universal in nature, if they find a place in all civilized societies in the world. It is for the big surprise that in fact exactly the result of the rule of law to the contrary. The more civilized a society is, the greater the inequality among its population – more injustice for the poor, less freedom because of the strict application of the law and hatred between citizens on grounds of race, caste and religion. What is wrong with the implementation of the so-called rule of law? » Read more: The Rule of Law

Will the Dummying Down of Society Cause More Civil Unrest and Violence?

October 17th, 2010

Many people believe that the United States falls through a period of simplifying our country’s history because of difficulties in our schools, the Internet, and problems with language barriers and the failure of the melting pot. No matter how you feel all that we are the reality that the Simplify explore any civilization is quite problematic. How you ask?

Well, those are the lower intelligence use very quickly Brawn on the brain, making them dangerous for those who use their brain to a stable and sustainable societies and cultures, so a real chance of winning the war of the genes create a lower intelligence means higher percentage of less intelligent people. And then the man is more responsible to the needs of their environment, such as air-flight reactions.

At this point the body becomes increasingly important, and the brain less, it has favored the survival of more than brains. However, if the intelligent people protect their civilization educate the next generation, then the human brain are constantly evolving to this new environment less hostile. Importance of these groups are separate. The whole theory, but some borrowed.

Not long ago, I was a friend to this theory, and / or observation of the mind and society, and therefore made, it said, “without understanding exactly what you say, I do not see why one or others, or whether it, we have expected. “

Right, it could be both, at least that’s what many futurists speculate. A group of human progress and their descendants in every new technology is concerned, life sciences, the mixture of human and machine, while not a large group of “humanist” to choose religious. » Read more: Will the Dummying Down of Society Cause More Civil Unrest and Violence?

Protest

October 17th, 2010

Event – The Right Way

Gandhi, the father of the nation not only in the purity of the end of thought, but it means well. He did not want to peaceful protest, nonviolent, and his humiliating. Each method of protest, which was out of pure means not strict with him. With “Satyagraha” nonviolent weapons, he brought the mighty British Empire collapsed and created conditions for the British to leave and free us. Subject of the claim must be to oppose the policies or actions of the responsible person, but not against the person himself. The largest protest as a tool against unjust actions or strategies are used. Demonstration against law and justice actions are necessary especially in the public sector must stop.
The protest is a tool to manifest reactions to events or situations to express. Demonstrators often organize events as a way to publicly and emphatically express their opinions, so that public opinion or government policy is affected. In some cases, events may take the form of direct action, to ensure that the desired changes. No one can the right to protest, but the current forms of protest, to deny the influence of changes must be within the limits of decency and human dignity. Methods of protest must be human, less civilized and barbaric, that we all live in civil societies where the rule of law and democracy are the rules of thumb. It is not to protest, but the methods of protest have to be reassessed.

Civil societies have recognized the various forms of protest as acceptable. They are widely used
1. Petitions

2. Letter writing campaigns

3. Sit-ins

4. Rasta Tour

5. Protest marches » Read more: Protest